Top 5 Rossum Alternatives in 2025

Top Rossum Alternatives Ranked
Rossum vs Docsumo
Docsumo offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly document processing solution compared to Rossum.
- Pricing: Docsumo (starts at $0.3/page with 100 free pages/month) vs Rossum (starts at $1,500/month)
- Target market: Docsumo (Mid-Market + Enterprise) vs Rossum (Mid-Market)
- Pre-trained models: Docsumo (100+ industry-specific models) vs Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases)
- Accuracy: Docsumo (95-99%) vs Rossum (82%)
- Custom model training: Docsumo (10 sample documents) vs Rossum (Long-drawn process with multiple steps)
- User interface: Docsumo (Premium customizable review screens) vs Rossum (Clean UI without customization options)
- Integration: Docsumo (10+ third-party apps) vs Rossum (20+ third-party apps)
Verdict -
Docsumo outperforms Rossum in accuracy, customization, and pricing flexibility, making it a superior choice for diverse document processing needs across various industries.
Rossum vs Amazon Textract
Both Rossum and Amazon Textract offer AI-powered document processing solutions with different strengths and target markets.
- Pricing: Rossum (starts at $1,500/month) vs Textract (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Rossum (Mid-Market) vs Textract (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases) vs Textract (15+ models for invoices, loan applications, etc.)
- Accuracy: Rossum (82%) vs Textract (93%)
- Custom model training: Rossum (Long-drawn process) vs Textract (Requires AWS expertise)
- Focus: Rossum (Financial document automation) vs Textract (General document processing)
- Integration: Rossum (20+ third-party apps) vs Textract (Complex to set up)
Verdict -
Amazon Textract offers better accuracy and is more suitable for large-scale enterprise needs, while Rossum provides specialized features for financial document processing in mid-market companies.
Rossum vs Google Document AI
Rossum specializes in financial document automation, while Google Document AI offers a more general-purpose approach to document processing.
- Pricing: Rossum (starts at $1,500/month) vs Google (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Rossum (Mid-Market) vs Google (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases) vs Google (15+ specialized models)
- Accuracy: Rossum (82%) vs Google (93%)
- Custom model training: Rossum (Long-drawn process) vs Google (Complex, requires IT support)
- Focus: Rossum (Financial document automation) vs Google (General document processing)
- Integration: Rossum (20+ third-party apps) vs Google (Complex to set up)
Verdict -
Google Document AI offers better accuracy and broader document support, while Rossum provides more specialized features for financial document processing.
Rossum vs ABBYY FlexiCapture
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers more advanced features for enterprise users, while Rossum focuses on financial document automation for mid-market companies.
- Pricing: Rossum (starts at $1,500/month) vs ABBYY (starts at $169/month)
- Target market: Rossum (Mid-Market) vs ABBYY (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases) vs ABBYY (Limited set for invoices and regulatory documents)
- Accuracy: Rossum (82%) vs ABBYY (82%)
- Custom model training: Rossum (Long-drawn process) vs ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support)
- User interface: Rossum (Clean and easy-to-use UI) vs ABBYY (Overwhelming interface with steep learning curve)
- Document support: Rossum (Focus on financial documents) vs ABBYY (Wide range including specialized formats)
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers more advanced features and broader document support for enterprises, while Rossum provides a more focused solution for financial document processing in mid-market companies.
Rossum vs Nanonets
Both Rossum and Nanonets offer AI-powered document processing solutions with different strengths and target markets.
- Pricing: Rossum (starts at $1,500/month) vs Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page)
- Target market: Both target Mid-Market segment
- Pre-trained models: Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases) vs Nanonets (Limited models for certain industries)
- Accuracy: Rossum (82%) vs Nanonets (93%)
- Custom model training: Rossum (Long-drawn process) vs Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents)
- User interface: Rossum (Clean and easy-to-use UI) vs Nanonets (Similar to ABBYY, built-in JSON output viewer)
- Integration: Rossum (20+ third-party apps) vs Nanonets (Limited third-party apps)
Verdict -
Nanonets offers better accuracy and a more accessible pricing model, while Rossum provides more specialized features for financial document processing and better third-party integrations.
6 Reasons why data-driven companies move from Rossum to Docsumo
Best suited for enterprises

With automation,
make data processing a breeze

Didn't find your API?
Train yours easily
Get on a call with our experts to try our sandbox environment before you try out Rossum API.

Get used to 90%+ touchless processing
Docsumo’s model learns as more document types are processed and gives more than 90% straight-through processing for the most common document formats.

Integrate easily with your existing systems
Unlike Rossum, Docsumo provides flexibility in output formats, delivering data in your preferred choices such as MS Excel and JSON.

A user interface so smooth that lets anyone get started in seconds
Unlike Rossum, we prioritize simplicity and efficiency, ensuring a smooth integration experience

Fill up the form to speak with an automation expert.
