Top 5 Amazon Textract Alternatives in 2025

Top Amazon Textract Alternatives Ranked
Amazon Textract vs Docsumo
Docsumo offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly document processing solution compared to Amazon Textract.
- Pricing: Docsumo ($0.3/page with 100 free pages/month) vs Textract ($1.50/1,000 pages)
- Pre-trained models: Docsumo (100+ industry-specific models) vs Textract (15+ models for invoices, loan applications, etc.)
- Accuracy: Docsumo (95-99%) vs Textract (93%)
- Custom model training: Docsumo (10 sample documents) vs Textract (requires AWS expertise)
- Data validation: Docsumo (Excel-like formula rules) vs Textract (limited validation capabilities)
- Analytics: Docsumo (detailed reporting dashboard) vs Textract (no dashboard)
- Integration: Docsumo (10+ third-party apps) vs Textract (complex to set up)
Verdict -
Docsumo outperforms Amazon Textract in accuracy, customization, and ease of use, making it a superior choice for diverse document processing needs.
Amazon Textract vs Google Document AI
Both Amazon Textract and Google Document AI offer similar capabilities, with some differences in specific features.
- Pricing: Both charge $1.50 per 1,000 pages
- Pre-trained models: Textract (15+ models) vs Google (15+ specialized models)
- Accuracy: Both demonstrate 93% OCR accuracy
- Handwritten text processing: Google (more consistent) vs Textract (lower accuracy)
- Integration: Textract (requires AWS expertise) vs Google (cloud-native architecture)
- Language support: Both primarily optimized for English-language documents
- Analytics: Neither offers a comprehensive dashboard
Verdict-
Google Document AI slightly edges out Amazon Textract with better handwritten text processing and easier integration, but both have similar core capabilities.
Amazon Textract vs ABBYY FlexiCapture
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers more advanced features and document support compared to Amazon Textract.
- Pricing: Textract ($1.50/1,000 pages) vs ABBYY (starts at $169/month, individual plans from $34.50/year)
- Document support: ABBYY (wide range including specialized formats) vs Textract (standard formats)
- Interface: ABBYY (graphical interface with PDF editing) vs Textract (API-focused)
- Accuracy: Textract (93%) vs ABBYY (82%)
- Compliance features: ABBYY (audit trails, version control) vs Textract (basic processing history)
- Learning curve: ABBYY (steeper) vs Textract (requires AWS expertise)
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture is superior for enterprises requiring advanced OCR capabilities and compliance features, despite its higher complexity and cost.
Amazon Textract vs Rossum
Rossum specializes in financial document processing, while Amazon Textract offers more general-purpose capabilities.
- Pricing: Textract ($1.50/1,000 pages) vs Rossum (starts at $1,500/month)
- Focus: Textract (general document processing) vs Rossum (financial document automation)
- Accuracy: Textract (93% general) vs Rossum (95%+ on financial documents)
- ERP integration: Rossum (direct SAP/Oracle integrations) vs Textract (requires custom development)
- Customization: Rossum (visual editors) vs Textract (requires AWS expertise)
- Pre-trained models: Textract (15+ models) vs Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases)
Verdict -
Rossum excels in financial document processing with higher accuracy and better integrations, while Textract offers more versatility across document types
Amazon Textract vs Nanonets
Nanonets provides a no-code platform for document automation, contrasting with Amazon Textract's more technical approach.
Key features -
- Pricing: Textract ($1.50/1,000 pages) vs Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page)
- Ease of use: Nanonets (no-code platform) vs Textract (requires AWS expertise)
- Pre-trained models: Textract (15+ models) vs Nanonets (limited models for certain industries)
- Integration: Nanonets (direct connectors to QuickBooks, Salesforce) vs Textract (requires custom API development)
- Processing speed: Textract (real-time for simple forms) vs Nanonets (2 pages/minute for complex documents)
- Custom training: Nanonets (50+ samples for unique document types) vs Textract (complex setup process)
Verdict -
Nanonets offers a more accessible platform for non-technical users, but Amazon Textract provides more robust capabilities for those with technical expertise.
Trusted by the world’s biggest data-driven businesses






Reasons why data-driven companies move from Amazon Textract to Docsumo
Best suited for no-code automation

With automation,
make data processing a breeze

Didn't find your API?
Train yours easily

Get used to 90%+ touchless processing

Integrate easily with your existing systems

A user interface so smooth that lets anyone get started in seconds

Transparent pricing. No surprises.
Fill up the form to speak with an automation expert.
