Top 5 ABBYY Flexicapture Alternatives in 2025
.webp)
Top Flexicapture Alternatives Ranked
ABBYY FlexiCapture vs Docsumo
Docsumo offers a more user-friendly and efficient approach to document automation compared to ABBYY FlexiCapture.
- Pricing: Docsumo (starts at $0.3/page with 100 free pages/month) vs ABBYY (starts at $169/month)
- Target market: Docsumo (Mid-Market + Enterprise) vs ABBYY (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Docsumo (100+ industry-specific models) vs ABBYY (Limited set for invoices and regulatory documents)
- Custom model training: Docsumo (10 sample documents) vs ABBYY (Requires IT support, very complex)
- User interface: Docsumo (Premium customizable review screens) vs ABBYY (Overwhelming interface with steep learning curve)
- Accuracy: Docsumo (95-99%) vs ABBYY (82%)
- Integration: Docsumo (10+ third-party apps) vs ABBYY (10+ third-party apps)
Verdict -
Docsumo outperforms ABBYY FlexiCapture in ease of use, accuracy, and customization, making it a better choice for businesses seeking efficient document automation.
ABBYY FlexiCapture vs Amazon Textract
ABBYY FlexiCapture provides a more comprehensive document processing solution compared to Amazon Textract's focused approach.
- Pricing: ABBYY (starts at $169/month) vs Textract (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Both target Enterprise segment
- Pre-trained models: ABBYY (Limited set for specific documents) vs Textract (15+ models for invoices, loan applications, etc.)
- Custom model training: ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support) vs Textract (Requires AWS expertise)
- User interface: ABBYY (Overwhelming with steep learning curve) vs Textract (Clean and easy-to-use UI)
- Accuracy: ABBYY (82%) vs Textract (93%)
- Integration: Both offer complex setup for third-party apps
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers more advanced features for specialized document processing, while Amazon Textract provides a more straightforward solution for basic document extraction tasks.
ABBYY FlexiCapture vs Google Document AI
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers more advanced features for enterprise users compared to Google Document AI's general-purpose approach.
- Pricing: ABBYY (starts at $169/month) vs Google (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Both target Enterprise segment
- Pre-trained models: ABBYY (Limited set for specific documents) vs Google (15+ specialized models)
- Custom model training: ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support) vs Google (Complex, requires IT support)
- User interface: ABBYY (Overwhelming with steep learning curve) vs Google (Requires IT support for customization)
- Accuracy: ABBYY (82%) vs Google (93%)
- Document support: ABBYY (Wide range including specialized formats) vs Google (Standard formats)
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture is better suited for enterprises requiring advanced document processing capabilities, while Google Document AI offers a more accessible solution for general use cases.
ABBYY FlexiCapture vs Rossum
ABBYY FlexiCapture offers a broader range of document processing capabilities compared to Rossum's focus on financial documents.
- Pricing: ABBYY (starts at $169/month) vs Rossum (starts at $1500/month)
- Target market: ABBYY (Enterprise) vs Rossum (Mid-Market)
- Pre-trained models: ABBYY (Limited set for specific documents) vs Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases)
- Custom model training: ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support) vs Rossum (Long-drawn process with multiple steps)
- User interface: ABBYY (Overwhelming with steep learning curve) vs Rossum (Clean and easy-to-use UI)
- Accuracy: ABBYY (82%) vs Rossum (82%)
- Integration: ABBYY (10+ third-party apps) vs Rossum (20+ third-party apps)
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture is better suited for enterprises requiring diverse document processing capabilities, while Rossum excels in financial document automation for mid-market companies.
ABBYY FlexiCapture vs Nanonets
ABBYY FlexiCapture provides more advanced features for enterprise users, while Nanonets offers a no-code approach for simpler document automation.
- Pricing: ABBYY (starts at $169/month) vs Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page)
- Target market: ABBYY (Enterprise) vs Nanonets (Mid-Market)
- Pre-trained models: ABBYY (Limited set for specific documents) vs Nanonets (Limited models for certain industries)
- Custom model training: ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support) vs Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents)
- User interface: ABBYY (Overwhelming with steep learning curve) vs Nanonets (Similar to ABBYY, built-in JSON output viewer)
- Accuracy: ABBYY (82%) vs Nanonets (93%)
- Integration: ABBYY (10+ third-party apps) vs Nanonets (Limited third-party apps)
Verdict -
ABBYY FlexiCapture is better for enterprises requiring advanced document processing capabilities, while Nanonets offers a more accessible solution for mid-market companies with simpler document automation needs.
“Docsumo is the best” - That's what they said
6 Reasons To Choose Docsumo over ABBYY Flexicapture
Best suited for lenders

Steer clear of delays with a quick setup & a user-friendly interface
Unlike ABBYY Flexicapture's platform, which has some critical reviews on its complexity and challenging configuration.

Didn't find your API?
Train yours easily
Flexicapture software doesn’t have a trial to experiment on its accuracy. Get on a call with our experts to try our sandbox environment.

Get used to easy preprocessing
Flexicapture OCR cannot split multi-PDF documents and can only categorize a limited set of document types.

Integrate easily with your existing systems

Reduce risk by validating data
ABBYY Flexicapture lacks the capability to handle these complex business cases.

Fill up the form to speak with an automation expert.
