Top 5 Nanonets Alternatives in 2025
.webp)
Top Nanonets Alternatives Ranked
Nanonets vs Docsumo
Nanonets and Docsumo are both AI-powered document processing platforms, with Docsumo offering more comprehensive features.
- Pricing: Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page) vs Docsumo (starts at $0.3/page with 100 free pages/month)
- Target market: Nanonets (Mid-Market) vs Docsumo (Mid-Market + Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Nanonets (300+ document types) vs Docsumo (100+ industry-specific models)
- Accuracy: Nanonets (93%) vs Docsumo (95-99%)
- Custom model training: Nanonets (50+ samples for unique document types) vs Docsumo (10 sample documents)
- User interface: Nanonets (Similar to ABBYY, built-in JSON output viewer) vs Docsumo (Premium customizable review screens)
- Integration: Nanonets (Limited third-party apps) vs Docsumo (10+ third-party apps)
Verdict -
Docsumo outperforms Nanonets in accuracy, customization options, and integration capabilities, making it a more versatile choice for diverse document processing needs.
Nanonets vs Amazon Textract
Nanonets provides a no-code AI platform for document automation, while Amazon Textract offers a more technical, AWS-integrated solution.
- Pricing: Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page) vs Textract (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Nanonets (Mid-Market) vs Textract (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Nanonets (300+ document types) vs Textract (15+ models for invoices, loan applications, etc.)
- Accuracy: Both at 93%
- Custom model training: Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents) vs Textract (Requires AWS expertise)
- User interface: Nanonets (No-code platform) vs Textract (Clean and easy-to-use UI)
- Integration: Nanonets (Limited third-party apps) vs Textract (Complex to set up)
Verdict -
Nanonets is better suited for mid-market companies seeking an easy-to-use solution, while Amazon Textract is more appropriate for enterprises already integrated with AWS services.
Nanonets vs Google Document AI
Nanonets offers a no-code platform for document automation, while Google Document AI provides a more technical, enterprise-focused solution.
- Pricing: Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page) vs Google (starts at $1.5/1,000 pages)
- Target market: Nanonets (Mid-Market) vs Google (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Nanonets (300+ document types) vs Google (15+ specialized models)
- Accuracy: Both at 93%
- Custom model training: Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents) vs Google (Complex, requires IT support)
- User interface: Nanonets (No-code platform) vs Google (Requires IT support for customization)
- Integration: Nanonets (Limited third-party apps) vs Google (Complex to set up)
Verdict -
Nanonets is more suitable for mid-market companies seeking a user-friendly solution, while Google Document AI caters to enterprises with more complex requirements and technical resources.
Nanonets vs ABBYY FlexiCapture
Nanonets offers a no-code AI platform for document automation, while ABBYY FlexiCapture provides a more advanced, enterprise-grade solution.
- Pricing: Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page) vs ABBYY (starts at $169/month)
- Target market: Nanonets (Mid-Market) vs ABBYY (Enterprise)
- Pre-trained models: Nanonets (300+ document types) vs ABBYY (Limited set for invoices and regulatory documents)
- Accuracy: Nanonets (93%) vs ABBYY (82%)
- Custom model training: Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents) vs ABBYY (Very complex, requires IT support)
- User interface: Nanonets (Similar to ABBYY, built-in JSON output viewer) vs ABBYY (Overwhelming interface with steep learning curve)
- Document support: Nanonets (Limited information) vs ABBYY (Wide range including specialized formats)
Verdict -
Nanonets is more suitable for mid-market companies seeking an accessible solution, while ABBYY FlexiCapture is better for enterprises requiring advanced document processing capabilities and specialized format support.
Nanonets vs Rossum
Nanonets and Rossum both offer AI-powered document processing solutions, with Rossum focusing more on financial document automation.
- Pricing: Nanonets (starts at $0.3/page) vs Rossum (starts at $1,500/month)
- Target market: Both target Mid-Market segment
- Pre-trained models: Nanonets (300+ document types) vs Rossum (25+ models for generic use cases)
- Accuracy: Nanonets (93%) vs Rossum (82%)
- Custom model training: Nanonets (Provision to train with 10 sample documents) vs Rossum (Long-drawn process with multiple steps)
- User interface: Nanonets (Similar to ABBYY, built-in JSON output viewer) vs Rossum (Clean and easy-to-use UI)
- Integration: Nanonets (Limited third-party apps) vs Rossum (20+ third-party apps)
Verdict -
Nanonets offers better accuracy and a more accessible pricing model, while Rossum provides more specialized features for financial document processing and better third-party integrations.
6 Reasons Why Companies Move from Nanonets to Docsumo
Best suited for enterprises

With automation,
make data processing a breeze

Didn't find your API?
Train yours easily
Get on a call with our experts to try our sandbox environment before you try out Nanonets API.

Get used to 90%+ touchless processing
Docsumo’s model learns as more document types are processed and also gives straight-through processing of more than 90% for all common use cases.

Integrate easily with your existing systems
Unlike Nanonets, Docsumo provides flexibility in output formats, delivering data in your preferred choices such as MS Excel and JSON.

A user interface so smooth that lets anyone get started in seconds

Fill up the form to speak with an automation expert.
